mirror of
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git
synced 2024-11-26 08:53:05 +00:00
182 lines
4.5 KiB
Go
182 lines
4.5 KiB
Go
|
package integration
|
||
|
|
||
|
import (
|
||
|
"testing"
|
||
|
|
||
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale"
|
||
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/hsic"
|
||
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/tsic"
|
||
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
|
||
|
// This tests a different ACL mechanism, if a host _cannot_ connect
|
||
|
// to another node at all based on ACL, it should just not be part
|
||
|
// of the NetMap sent to the host. This is slightly different than
|
||
|
// the other tests as we can just check if the hosts are present
|
||
|
// or not.
|
||
|
func TestACLHostsInNetMapTable(t *testing.T) {
|
||
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
||
|
|
||
|
// NOTE: All want cases currently checks the
|
||
|
// total count of expected peers, this would
|
||
|
// typically be the client count of the users
|
||
|
// they can access minus one (them self).
|
||
|
tests := map[string]struct {
|
||
|
users map[string]int
|
||
|
policy headscale.ACLPolicy
|
||
|
want map[string]int
|
||
|
}{
|
||
|
// Test that when we have no ACL, each client netmap has
|
||
|
// the amount of peers of the total amount of clients
|
||
|
"base-acls": {
|
||
|
users: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 2,
|
||
|
"user2": 2,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
policy: headscale.ACLPolicy{
|
||
|
ACLs: []headscale.ACL{
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"*:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
||
|
"user2": 3, // ns2 + ns1
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Test that when we have two users, which cannot see
|
||
|
// eachother, each node has only the number of pairs from
|
||
|
// their own user.
|
||
|
"two-isolated-users": {
|
||
|
users: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 2,
|
||
|
"user2": 2,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
policy: headscale.ACLPolicy{
|
||
|
ACLs: []headscale.ACL{
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 1,
|
||
|
"user2": 1,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Test that when we have two users, with ACLs and they
|
||
|
// are restricted to a single port, nodes are still present
|
||
|
// in the netmap.
|
||
|
"two-restricted-present-in-netmap": {
|
||
|
users: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 2,
|
||
|
"user2": 2,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
policy: headscale.ACLPolicy{
|
||
|
ACLs: []headscale.ACL{
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:22"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:22"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:22"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:22"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 3,
|
||
|
"user2": 3,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
// Test that when we have two users, that are isolated,
|
||
|
// but one can see the others, we have the appropriate number
|
||
|
// of peers. This will still result in all the peers as we
|
||
|
// need them present on the other side for the "return path".
|
||
|
"two-ns-one-isolated": {
|
||
|
users: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 2,
|
||
|
"user2": 2,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
policy: headscale.ACLPolicy{
|
||
|
ACLs: []headscale.ACL{
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
Action: "accept",
|
||
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
||
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
||
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
||
|
"user2": 3, // ns1 + ns2 (return path)
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
for name, testCase := range tests {
|
||
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||
|
scenario, err := NewScenario()
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
spec := testCase.users
|
||
|
|
||
|
err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnv(spec,
|
||
|
[]tsic.Option{},
|
||
|
hsic.WithACLPolicy(&testCase.policy),
|
||
|
// hsic.WithTestName(fmt.Sprintf("aclinnetmap%s", name)),
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
allClients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients()
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
err = scenario.WaitForTailscaleSync()
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
// allHostnames, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClientsFQDNs()
|
||
|
// assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
for _, client := range allClients {
|
||
|
status, err := client.Status()
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
|
||
|
user := status.User[status.Self.UserID].LoginName
|
||
|
|
||
|
assert.Equal(t, (testCase.want[user]), len(status.Peer))
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
err = scenario.Shutdown()
|
||
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
})
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|